Most musicians eventually hit the same wall. They open up a popular website builder, pick a template that looks vaguely “creative,” and try to bend it into something that works for an artist. It starts fine, but after a couple of hours, things get messy. The features they actually need simply aren’t there, and the ones that exist are designed for small businesses, photographers, or cafés.
Artists end up forcing their website into a shape it was never meant to take.
Here’s why this happens so often.
1. No real music pages
Traditional builders usually let you embed a Spotify player or paste a YouTube link, but that’s not the same as having a proper music page. Artists need a place where albums, tracks, artwork, lyrics, credits, and streaming links are organized cleanly. Trying to build that manually with generic page blocks is frustrating and honestly never looks quite right.
2. Zero focus on EPKs
Press kits are still essential for booking shows, reaching blogs, or sending info to promoters. But typical website builders don’t offer EPK templates, contact sections tailored to media, downloadable assets, or press-friendly layouts. You end up cobbling together a mix of text blocks, images, and Google Drive links. It works, but it feels like a workaround.
3. No built-in streaming integrations
Artists don’t just need to embed players; they need their website to understand music platforms. Things like automatic links to Spotify, Apple Music, Bandcamp, or YouTube, or the ability to sync releases. Traditional builders don’t do this. They give you a blank canvas and hope you figure out the rest.
4. Merch and shops are built for general e-commerce
Selling a hoodie or vinyl is not the same as running a generic online store. Artists need lighter, simpler workflows: SKU handling, limited runs, preorder windows, bundled digital downloads, or merch connected to events. Typical builders treat it like any other shop, which adds unnecessary complexity for musicians.
5. They’re too broad by design
Website builders try to serve everyone: plumbers, yoga studios, freelancers, photographers, restaurants, you name it. Because of that, they can’t dive deep into the specific needs of musicians. The result is a tool that does many things decently, but nothing specifically for artists.
6. The “music templates” they offer are surface level
You’ve probably seen them. A hero image, a big name across the top, maybe a tour date section. They look nice at first glance, but once you try to adjust them to your real workflow, they fall apart. They don’t scale with multiple releases, they don’t handle large galleries, they don’t fit long bios, and they definitely don’t behave like an EPK.
7. Artists end up relying on scattered links
Because the website can’t handle everything, musicians patch together:
Spotify links, YouTube links, Bandcamp embeds, Linktree profiles, TikTok, Instagram, merch pages hosted elsewhere. The site becomes a glorified menu, not a home base.
A proper artist website should bring these pieces together, not send visitors away in five different directions.

